The paper attempts to highlight the main characteristics and the main flaws of the most important classification of theories of revolution, the generational approach.The first half aims to discuss and present the main tenets of the qf1510 most important taxonomy of theories of revolution, as well as the similar attempts made by several scholars to build alternative classifications of theories of revolution.The second part of the paper attempts to show the limits of the aforementioned perspective and the importance of looking for alternative approaches to the study of revolutions.The paper considers that the generational perspective remains impermissibly g fuel spiderverse flexible and elusive, ignoring the main paradigmatic debates within the field of study and maintaining a strong bias in favor of the clearest category, that of structural theories.